Display Reviews - DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com/category/display-reviews/ The leading source of independent audio, display, battery and image quality measurements and ratings for smartphone, camera, lens, wireless speaker and laptop since 2008. Fri, 08 Mar 2024 15:31:31 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3 https://www.dxomark.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/logo-o-transparent-150x150.png Display Reviews - DXOMARK https://www.dxomark.com/category/display-reviews/ 32 32 Honor Magic V2 Display test https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic-v2-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic-v2-display-test/#respond Tue, 05 Mar 2024 22:01:01 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=167502&preview=true&preview_id=167502 We put the Honor Magic V2 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 7.92 inches OLED (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) Resolution: 2156 x 2344 [...]

The post Honor Magic V2 Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the Honor Magic V2 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 7.92 inches OLED (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Resolution: 2156 x 2344 pixels, (~402 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 9.78:9
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Honor Magic V2 Honor Magic V2
151
display
Readability
149

163

Color
157

164

Video
138

162

Motion
146

159

Touch
165

170

Artifacts
160

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
8th
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
6th
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
6. Google Pixel Fold
151
6. Honor Magic V2
151
6. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
14. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
15. OnePlus Open
147
16. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
16. Huawei P60 Pro
146
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
20. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
22. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
23. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
23. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
23. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
23. Vivo X Fold
140
27. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
27. Honor Magic Vs
139
27. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
27. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
31. Oppo Find X5
138
32. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
32. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
34. Huawei P50 Pro
135
34. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
34. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
37. Oppo Find X6
134
37. Oppo Find N2
134
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
37. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
42. Vivo X90 Pro
133
42. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
45. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
46. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
49. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
49. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
49. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
49. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
53. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
53. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
57. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
57. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
61. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
61. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
63. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
63. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
63. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
66. LG Wing
125
66. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
66. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
69. Oppo Find N
124
69. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
69. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
72. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
72. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
74. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
74. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
76. Huawei P40 Pro
120
77. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
78. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
79. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
80. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
81. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
82. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
83. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
84. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
85. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
86. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69

Pros

  • Anti-reflective film that improves screen readability
  • Well-managed frame drops when playing video games
  • Smooth display reaction in every use case

Cons

  • Lack of readability under sunlight
  • Color rendering appears unnatural in outdoor conditions.
  • Lack of uniformity in brightness and color

The Honor Magic V2 achieved a very high score in its display tests thanks to big improvements over its predecessor the Magic Vs in all attributes, especially video and touch.

The unfolded screen’s readability benefited from the anti-reflective film, especially when used outdoors. The film’s effectiveness on most light wavelengths as well as the screen’s lack of flicker lifted the device’s artifacts score close to the top. The Magic V2’s peak brightness, however, was measured at 950 nits, lower than the 2500 nits advertised, and was even a bit lower than the Magic Vs. The gamma was also better on the Magic V2 because the rendering under sunlight was a bit more natural.

The device provided a very satisfying video-watching experience thanks to the screen’s brightness for HDR10 video as well as the display’s color fidelity.

The Honor Magic V2 screen’s refresh rate has increased to 120 Hz, up from the already good 90 Hz of the Magic Vs. In addition, the display’s touch interactions were very accurate and smooth.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

149

Honor Magic V2

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions
Contrast under various lighting conditions


Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic V2, Honor Magic Vs, OnePlus Open, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in an outdoor (20 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic V2, Honor Magic Vs, OnePlus Open, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

157

Honor Magic V2

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux


Color rendering indoors (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Honor Magic V2, Honor Magic Vs, OnePlus Open, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering outdoors (20 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Honor Magic V2, Honor Magic Vs, OnePlus Open, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
(Photos for illustration only)

Color fidelity measurements
Honor Magic V2, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Honor Magic V2, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.

Video

138

Honor Magic V2

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)


Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Honor Magic V2, Honor Magic Vs, OnePlus Open, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
(Photos for illustration only)

Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

146

Honor Magic V2

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

165

Honor Magic V2

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch
Average Touch Response Time Honor Magic V2
86 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

160

Honor Magic V2

163

OnePlus Open
i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) Honor Magic V2
1.3 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Honor Magic V2
90 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
Aliasing (closeup)
Honor Magic V2

Honor Magic V2 – Crop
Honor Magic V2 – Crop 2
Honor Magic V2 – Crop 3

The post Honor Magic V2 Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic-v2-display-test/feed/ 0 Honor Magic V2 DISPLAY DISPLAY Honor_Magic_V2_readability_indoor Honor_Magic_V2_readability_shade Honor_Magic_V2_readability_uniformity Honor_Magic_V2_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient Honor_Magic_V2_color_indoor Honor_Magic_V2_color_shade Honor_Magic_V2_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom Honor_Magic_V2_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom Honor_Magic_V2_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom Honor_Magic_V2_video_lowlight_1 Honor_Magic_V2_Gamut_Video_HDR10 Honor_Magic_V2_Gamut_Video_SDR Honor_Magic_V2_motion_framedrops_fps_1 Honor_Magic_V2_motion_framedrops_fps_2 740_Aliasing Honor_Magic_V2_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_1 Honor_Magic_V2_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_2 Honor_Magic_V2_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_3 Xiaomi 14 Display test https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14-display-test/#respond Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:44:59 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=167089&preview=true&preview_id=167089 We put the Xiaomi 14 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 6.36 inches OLED (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) Resolution: 1200 x 2670 pixels, [...]

The post Xiaomi 14 Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the Xiaomi 14 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.36 inches OLED (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Resolution: 1200 x 2670 pixels, (~460 ppi density)
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Xiaomi 14 Xiaomi 14
133
display
Readability
136

163

Color
159

164

Video
124

162

Motion
112

159

Touch
111

170

Artifacts
133

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
54th
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in Premium Ranking
9th
1. Google Pixel 8
154
1. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
4. Apple iPhone 15
145
5. Apple iPhone 14
139
6. Apple iPhone 13
136
7. Xiaomi 13
135
8. Asus Zenfone 10
134
9. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
9. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
9. Xiaomi 14
133
12. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
12. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
12. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
15. OnePlus 11
129
15. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
15. Xiaomi 13T
129
18. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
19. OnePlus 9
125
19. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
19. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
19. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
19. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
24. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
25. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
25. Vivo X51 5G
123
27. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
27. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
27. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
30. Apple iPhone 12
120
31. Xiaomi 12
118
32. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
32. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
34. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
35. Asus Zenfone 8
113
36. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
37. Fairphone 5
110
38. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
39. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
40. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
41. Google Pixel 5
101
42. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
43. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
43. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
45. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
46. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
47. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60

Pros

  • Smooth display experience when scrolling the web or playing video games
  • Adapted brightness in low-light conditions
  • Pleasing color rendering in indoor conditions

Cons

  • Many frame mismatches when playing video games or watching videos
  • Lack of brightness and dark details when watching HDR10 videos
  • Display is not uniform

The Xiaomi 14 had a mixed display performance in our tests, although it offered a very smooth screen experience in all use cases, with a steady performance in the readability and color attributes.

The device’s overall performance, however, did not quite reach that of the predecessor Xiaomi 13, weighed down by the display’s performance in the motion attribute and instability when watching HDR videos.

The Xiaomi 14’s screen also lacked uniformity in brightness and color.

Although Xiaomi says that the device can reach a peak brightness of 3000 nits, our tests showed the device reaching 2740 nits — but only for HDR video content. Our experts measured 923 nits under 20K lux and only 1490 nits under 100K lux on a classic (20% window) white image pattern. Therefore, the Xiaomi 14 might fall a bit short on readability for intense lighting conditions. However, the display managed its brightness well, particularly in low-light conditions.

Although the device showed an improvement in artifacts management over the Xiaomi 13, the screen registered a high level of flicker in default mode (an anti-flicker feature that is available to limit this phenomenon), similar to the Xiaomi 13. Strong aliasing was also visible while gaming.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

136

Xiaomi 14

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions


Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Xiaomi 14, Xiaomi 13, Samsung Galaxy S24, Apple iPhone 15
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in an outdoor (20 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Xiaomi 14, Xiaomi 13, Samsung Galaxy S24, Apple iPhone 15
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

159

Xiaomi 14

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux


Color rendering indoors (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi 14, Xiaomi 13, Samsung Galaxy S24, Apple iPhone 15
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering outdoors (20 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi 14, Xiaomi 13, Samsung Galaxy S24, Apple iPhone 15
(Photos for illustration only)

Color fidelity measurements
Xiaomi 14, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Xiaomi 14, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.

Video

124

Xiaomi 14

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)


Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi 14, Xiaomi 13, Samsung Galaxy S24, Apple iPhone 15
(Photos for illustration only)

Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

112

Xiaomi 14

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

111

Xiaomi 14

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch
Average Touch Response Time Xiaomi 14
64 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

133

Xiaomi 14

163

OnePlus Open
i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) Xiaomi 14
4.7 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Xiaomi 14
480 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
[image_title content=”Aliasing (closeup)”

Xiaomi 14

Xiaomi 14 – Crop 1
Xiaomi 14 – Crop 2
Xiaomi 14 – Crop 3

The post Xiaomi 14 Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-14-display-test/feed/ 0 Xiaomi 14 DISPLAY DISPLAY Xiaomi_14_readability_indoor Xiaomi_14_readability_shade Xiaomi_14_readability_uniformity Xiaomi_14_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient Xiaomi_14_color_indoor Xiaomi_14_color_shade Xiaomi_14_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom Xiaomi_14_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom Xiaomi_14_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom HDR10Reshoot Xiaomi_14_Gamut_Video_HDR10 Xiaomi_14_Gamut_Video_SDR Xiaomi_14_motion_framedrops_fps_1 Xiaomi_14_motion_framedrops_fps_2 Xiaomi_14_artifacts_aliasing_full Xiaomi_14_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_1 Xiaomi_14_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_2 Xiaomi_14_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_3 Honor Magic6 Pro Display test https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic6-pro-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic6-pro-display-test/#respond Sun, 25 Feb 2024 16:33:05 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=167453&preview=true&preview_id=167453 We put the Honor Magic6 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 6.8 inches OLED, 109.8 cm2 (~91.9% screen-to-body ratio) Dimensions  162.5 [...]

The post Honor Magic6 Pro Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the Honor Magic6 Pro through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across
six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.8 inches OLED, 109.8 cm2 (~91.9% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions  162.5 mm x 75.8 mm x 8.9 mm
  • Resolution: 1280 x 2800 pixels, (~453 ppi density)
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Honor Magic6 Pro Honor Magic6 Pro
157
display
Readability
161

163

Color
154

164

Video
157

162

Motion
159

Best

Touch
167

170

Artifacts
141

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
1st
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
1st
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
6. Google Pixel Fold
151
6. Honor Magic V2
151
6. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
14. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
15. OnePlus Open
147
16. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
16. Huawei P60 Pro
146
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
20. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
22. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
23. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
23. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
23. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
23. Vivo X Fold
140
27. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
27. Honor Magic Vs
139
27. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
27. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
31. Oppo Find X5
138
32. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
32. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
34. Huawei P50 Pro
135
34. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
34. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
37. Oppo Find X6
134
37. Oppo Find N2
134
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
37. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
42. Vivo X90 Pro
133
42. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
45. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
46. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
49. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
49. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
49. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
49. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
53. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
53. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
57. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
57. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
61. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
61. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
63. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
63. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
63. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
66. LG Wing
125
66. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
66. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
69. Oppo Find N
124
69. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
69. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
72. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
72. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
74. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
74. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
76. Huawei P40 Pro
120
77. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
78. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
79. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
80. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
81. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
82. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
83. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
84. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
85. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
86. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69

Pros

  • Well-suited brightness levels for different lighting conditions
  • Best-in-class motion management
  • Accurate, reactive, and smooth touch panel
  • Good HDR video experience in low-light conditions

Cons

  • Immediate color shift when viewing at an angle
  • Perceivable striped pattern on a dark uniform background when in dark-room conditions

The Honor Magic6 Pro Display put in a top-scoring performance, with an all-around excellent user experience in all our use cases, particularly in gaming.

The Magic6 Pro’s readability was overall excellent in all lighting environments, with a steady and reliable performance. While the maximum brightness did not reach the same levels attained by the Galaxy S24 Ultra or even some of the Magic6 Pro’s competitors, the screen was consistently and comfortably readable in all conditions – not too bright in low-light or dark conditions and not too dark when outdoors to affect the user experience. Additionally, the outdoor brightness level remained consistent for all types of displayed content, which is not the case for most competitors’ devices, whose display luminance decreases as white areas on the screen increase. Although the device appeared uniform in our test, a faint striped pattern was visible on the screen when room or background conditions turned dark. However, this striped pattern was not visible in other lighting conditions.

The screen’s colors were generally accurate and quite stable outdoors, but our testers did note some immediate color shifts when holding the device at an angle. Although most screens shift colors at wide angles, the Magic6 Pro’s colors were shifting at relatively lower angles when compared with the competition.

The video-watching experience was quite satisfying and comfortable, with appropriate luminosity and good details in the dark tones, especially when viewing videos at night.

The device’s display showed significant improvements over its predecessor the Honor Magic5 Pro in all subscores, especially in motion. The Magic6 Pro achieved a top score in motion thanks to its exceptional management of frame mismatches and motion blur, providing the user with an excellent experience watching high-quality videos or playing video games. Also contributing to the top score in motion was the absence of any delayed playback when sliding forward or backward on a video.

In touch, the Honor Magic6 Pro came very close to the top score, but the screen lacked some smoothness when viewing the gallery. However, users who like to play video games on their phones should take note of the Honor Magic6 Pro’s touch response time, which at 53 ms shows a marked improvement from the Magic5 Pro’s 70 ms, and even surpassed the Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S24+’s measured 65 ms. (For those keeping track, the fastest touch response time we have tested so far was on the Lenovo Legion Y90, which clocked in at 41 ms!)

When it came to artifacts, the Honor Magic6 Pro managed them very well. No unintended touches were being executed on the screen, and the display was free of flicker.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK
engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions.
Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image
(gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate
smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories.
Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

161

Honor Magic6 Pro

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably
users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its
Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to
laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test
display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions


Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic6 Pro, Google Pixel 8 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Honor Magic6 Pro, Google Pixel 8 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green
color, the more uniform the display.

Color

154

Honor Magic6 Pro

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux


Color rendering indoors (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Honor Magic6 Pro, Google Pixel 8 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering in sunlight (>90 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Honor Magic6 Pro, Google Pixel 8 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
(Photos for illustration only)
Color fidelity measurements
Honor Magic6 Pro, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB
color space
Honor Magic6 Pro, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the
Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and
its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow
stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a
measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the
inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle
are noticeable.

White spectrum with/without Blue Light Filter
Spectrum measurement comparison of a white web page with the Blue Light Filter on and off.

Video

157

Honor Magic6 Pro

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)


Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Honor Magic6 Pro, Google Pixel 8 Pro, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
(Photos for illustration only)

Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent
of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master
color space of each video.

Motion

159

Honor Magic6 Pro

Best

i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic
contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn
more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second
video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

167

Honor Magic6 Pro

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot
and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time
evaluation.

Average Touch Response Time Honor Magic6 Pro
53 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

141

Honor Magic6 Pro

163

OnePlus Open
i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for
the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures
precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing
when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display
motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) Honor Magic6 Pro
5 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Honor Magic6 Pro
4320 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.

The post Honor Magic6 Pro Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/honor-magic6-pro-display-test/feed/ 0 Honor Magic6 Pro Best DISPLAY DISPLAY Honor_Magic6_Pro_readability_indoor Honor_Magic6_Pro_readability_sunlight Honor_Magic6_Pro_readability_uniformity Honor_Magic6_Pro_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient Honor_Magic6_Pro_color_indoor Honor_Magic6_Pro_color_sunlight Honor_Magic6_Pro_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom Honor_Magic6_Pro_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom Honor_Magic6_Pro_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom Honor_Magic6_Pro_video_lowlight_1 Honor_Magic6_Pro_Gamut_Video_HDR10 Honor_Magic6_Pro_Gamut_Video_SDR Best Honor_Magic6_Pro_motion_framedrops_fps_1 Honor_Magic6_Pro_motion_framedrops_fps_2 Samsung Galaxy S24+ Display test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-plus-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-plus-display-test/#respond Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:32:25 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=166553 The Samsung Galaxy S24+ display’s overall performance was the same as the Galaxy S24 in all respects except one. But thanks to the S24+’s larger screen size, which gives the device a larger screen-to-body ratio, the management of artifacts was a few points better than on the smaller S24. Given the similarities between the two [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy S24+ Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> The Samsung Galaxy S24+ display’s overall performance was the same as the Galaxy S24 in all respects except one. But thanks to the S24+’s larger screen size, which gives the device a larger screen-to-body ratio, the management of artifacts was a few points better than on the smaller S24.

Given the similarities between the two models and the same scores in nearly all the attributes, we direct you to the display test results of the Samsung Galaxy S24.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.7 inches Dynamic AMOLED 2X (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 158.5 x 75.9 x 7.7 mm (6.22 x 2.95 x 0.28 inches)
  • Resolution: 1440 x 3120 pixels, (~513 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
display
Readability
163

Best

Color
160

164

Video
148

162

Motion
152

159

Touch
170

Best

Artifacts
117

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
3rd
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
3rd
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
6. Google Pixel Fold
151
6. Honor Magic V2
151
6. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
14. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
15. OnePlus Open
147
16. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
16. Huawei P60 Pro
146
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
20. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
22. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
23. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
23. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
23. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
23. Vivo X Fold
140
27. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
27. Honor Magic Vs
139
27. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
27. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
31. Oppo Find X5
138
32. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
32. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
34. Huawei P50 Pro
135
34. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
34. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
37. Oppo Find X6
134
37. Oppo Find N2
134
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
37. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
42. Vivo X90 Pro
133
42. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
45. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
46. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
49. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
49. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
49. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
49. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
53. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
53. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
57. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
57. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
61. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
61. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
63. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
63. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
63. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
66. LG Wing
125
66. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
66. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
69. Oppo Find N
124
69. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
69. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
72. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
72. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
74. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
74. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
76. Huawei P40 Pro
120
77. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
78. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
79. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
80. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
81. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
82. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
83. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
84. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
85. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
86. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69

Pros

  • Good readability under sunlight thanks to a very high peak brightness
  • Accurate color rendering in most lighting environments
  • Excellent management of frame mismatches when watching all types of videos or playing video games

Cons

  • Excessively high brightness levels in video performance
  • Lack of brightness and details in indoor lighting environment
  • Poor management of involuntary touches

 

The post Samsung Galaxy S24+ Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-plus-display-test/feed/ 0 Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus Best Best DISPLAY DISPLAY Samsung Galaxy S24 Display test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-display-test/#respond Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:00:39 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=165758&preview=true&preview_id=165758 We put the Samsung Galaxy S24 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 6.2 inches Dynamic AMOLED 2X (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) Dimensions: 147.0 [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy S24 Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the Samsung Galaxy S24 through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.2 inches Dynamic AMOLED 2X (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 147.0 x 70.6 x 7.6 mm (5.79 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches)
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2340 pixels, (~416 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Galaxy S24
154
display
Readability
163

Best

Color
160

164

Video
148

162

Motion
152

159

Touch
170

Best

Artifacts
114

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
3rd
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in Premium Ranking
1st
1. Google Pixel 8
154
1. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
4. Apple iPhone 15
145
5. Apple iPhone 14
139
6. Apple iPhone 13
136
7. Xiaomi 13
135
8. Asus Zenfone 10
134
9. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
9. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
9. Xiaomi 14
133
12. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
12. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
12. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
15. OnePlus 11
129
15. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
15. Xiaomi 13T
129
18. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
19. OnePlus 9
125
19. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
19. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
19. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
19. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
24. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
25. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
25. Vivo X51 5G
123
27. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
27. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
27. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
30. Apple iPhone 12
120
31. Xiaomi 12
118
32. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
32. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
34. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
35. Asus Zenfone 8
113
36. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
37. Fairphone 5
110
38. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
39. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
40. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
41. Google Pixel 5
101
42. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
43. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
43. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
45. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
46. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
47. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60

Pros

  • Good readability under sunlight thanks to a very high peak brightness
  • Accurate color rendering in most lighting environments
  • Excellent management of frame mismatches when watching  videos or playing video games

Cons

  • Excessively high brightness levels in HDR video playback
  • Lack of brightness and details in indoor lighting environment
  • Poor management of involuntary touches

The Samsung Galaxy S24 nearly matched the display performance of the top-of-the-line S24 Ultra, thanks to achieving two top scores in readability and touch, but the smaller device was held back due to its management of artifacts.

Even though the devices have key differences, mainly in size, chipset, and glass, the Galaxy S24’s display behavior was very similar to that of the Ultra version. The 6.2-inch S24, like the 6.7-inch S24+, was released with the latest version of  Samsung’s in-house chip, Exynos 2400, while the 6.8-inch S24 Ultra sports Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The S24’s glass protection is the same as the one used on the S23 series, whereas the S24 Ultra’s display has glass reinforced with anti-reflective properties, which played a role in artifacts management.

While the lack of an anti-reflective screen cost the S24 significant points in artifacts, due to poor reflection management, it could also be said that the older glass was a contributing factor in S24 attaining a top score in readability. When it came to luminance, the S24 achieved a slightly higher peak than the already-impressive peak of the S24 Ultra, making the S24 a very readable screen in sunlight. Peak brightness, better gamma management under sunlight, and a more uniform screen all helped the device achieve a top score in the readability attribute.

In our display evaluation, our testers found the S24’s screen colors to be a huge improvement over the predecessor S23. The colors on the S24 were much more accurate than on previous S-series models, particularly outdoors, correcting the color artifact noticed on the S23 series. The S24 series’ new type of color signature, with the same color rendering across all three models, offers much more of a “natural” rendering compared to the previous series. However, when viewing the S24 screen on an angle, screen colors did change, but not as much as they did on the S24 Ultra, a factor that helped the S24 achieve a slightly better score in the color attribute.

An overly bright screen can make watching videos in a dark environment quite uncomfortable if the device does not sufficiently decrease brightness. In our tests, the S24’s screen, like on the S24 Ultra, lost some points here for remaining much too bright when viewing videos.

In the motion attribute, stutter was visible when resuming the video in playback, showing that the S24 was a bit slower than the S24 Ultra in execution.

The S24 reached a top score for its touch interactions, which were accurate and smooth, with a fast response time.

The S24’s impressive display performance earned it the top spot so far among devices in the Premium segment.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

163

Samsung Galaxy S24

Best

i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions
Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in an outdoor (20 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability at a 45° angle

From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

160

Samsung Galaxy S24

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux


Color rendering indoors (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering outdoors (20 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering in sunlight (>90 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)
Color fidelity measurements
Samsung Galaxy S24, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Samsung Galaxy S24, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.
Color shift on angle

From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)

Video

148

Samsung Galaxy S24

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)


Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)

Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy S23, Apple iPhone 15, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustration only)
Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

152

Samsung Galaxy S24

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

170

Samsung Galaxy S24

Best

i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch
Average Touch Response Time Samsung Galaxy S24
65 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

114

Samsung Galaxy S24

163

OnePlus Open
i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) Samsung Galaxy S24
4.9 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Samsung Galaxy S24
480 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
Aliasing (closeup)
Samsung Galaxy S24
(Photos for illustration only)

The post Samsung Galaxy S24 Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-display-test/feed/ 0 Samsung Galaxy S24 Best Best DISPLAY DISPLAY Best Samsung_Galaxy_S24_readability_indoor Samsung_Galaxy_S24_readability_shade Samsung_Galaxy_S24_readability_sunlight Samsung_Galaxy_S24_readability_angle_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_readability_angle_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_readability_uniformity Samsung_Galaxy_S24_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient Samsung_Galaxy_S24_color_indoor Samsung_Galaxy_S24_color_shade Samsung_Galaxy_S24_color_sunlight Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S24_color_angle_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_color_angle_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_video_lowlight_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_video_lowlight_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Gamut_Video_HDR10 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Gamut_Video_SDR Samsung_Galaxy_S24_motion_framedrops_fps_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_motion_framedrops_fps_2 Best Samsung_Galaxy_S24_artifacts_aliasing_full Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Display test https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-redmi-note-13-pro-plus-5g-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-redmi-note-13-pro-plus-5g-display-test/#respond Thu, 08 Feb 2024 20:55:44 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=165979&preview=true&preview_id=165979 We put the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 6.67 inches AMOLED, (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) Dimensions: [...]

The post Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.67 inches AMOLED, (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches)
  • Resolution: 1220 x 2712 pixels, (~446 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 20:9
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
display
Readability
116

163

Color
154

164

Video
108

162

Motion
108

159

Touch
134

170

Artifacts
125

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
109th
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in High-End Ranking
14th
1. Google Pixel 7a
140
1. Google Pixel 7
140
1. Honor 90
140
4. Nothing Phone (2)
135
5. Xiaomi 12T
131
6. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
6. Xiaomi 11T
129
8. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
9. OnePlus 8T
127
10. Google Pixel 6a
125
10. Google Pixel 6
125
12. Honor 70
124
12. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
15. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
16. Nothing Phone(1)
120
16. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
18. Realme GT 5G
118
19. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
20. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
21. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
22. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
22. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
22. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
25. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
25. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
27. POCO F4 GT
107
27. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
29. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
29. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
31. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
32. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
33. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
34. Fairphone 4
87
35. Crosscall Action-X5
77

Pros

  • Good color rendering in most lighting conditions
  • Touch interactions are quite smooth and accurate in most use cases
  • No flicker and more comfortable to use in low-light environment

Cons

  • Lacks brightness when playing HDR10 video
  • When playing video games, frame mismatches are visible
  • Lack of screen brightness and details under sunlight conditions

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G had a mixed performance in our DXOMARK Display tests, with the High-end phone’s screen staying true to colors amid uneven brightness levels that affected the overall user experience.

The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s flicker-free screen was comfortable to use particularly when indoors and in low light, providing consistently good colors in most use cases. But readability of the screen declined when outdoors, as the control of brightness levels became unstable in sunlight, making some color nuances appear flat.

Watching HDR videos in a dark environment was affected by the screen’s lack of brightness and many of the video’s details were hard to see. The video experience was also affected by the delayed resumption of playback after sliding backward or forward on a video.

Touch interactions when scrolling the web or viewing photos were quite smooth, and response time was overall very fast. However, when playing video games, the screen was vulnerable to many unintended touches and mismatched frames.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

116

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions


Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

154

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux


Color rendering indoors (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering in sunlight (>90 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos for illustration only)
Color fidelity measurements
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.

Video

108

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)


Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos for illustration only)

Clockwise from top left: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Google Pixel 7a, Honor 90
(Photos for illustration only)
Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

108

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

134

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch
Average Touch Response Time Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
64 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

125

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G

163

OnePlus Open
i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
4.6 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
1930 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
Aliasing (closeup)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
(Photos for illustration only)

The post Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-redmi-note-13-pro-plus-5g-display-test/feed/ 0 DISPLAY DISPLAY Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_readability_indoor-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_readability_sunlight-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_readability_uniformity-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_color_indoor-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_color_sunlight-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_video_lowlight_1-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_video_lowlight_2-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_Gamut_Video_HDR10-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_Gamut_Video_SDR-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_motion_framedrops_fps_1-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_motion_framedrops_fps_2-7 Xiaomi_Redmi_Note_13_Pro_5G_artifacts_aliasing_full-7 Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Display test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-ultra-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-ultra-display-test/#respond Wed, 31 Jan 2024 13:04:01 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=165536&preview=true&preview_id=165536 We put the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 6.8 inches Dynamic AMOLED 2X (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) Dimensions: [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.8 inches Dynamic AMOLED 2X (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 162.3 x 79.0 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 inches)
  • Resolution: 1440 x 3120 pixels, (~505 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
display
Readability
161

163

Color
148

164

Video
152

162

Motion
156

159

Touch
162

170

Artifacts
148

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
2nd
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
2nd
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
6. Google Pixel Fold
151
6. Honor Magic V2
151
6. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
14. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
15. OnePlus Open
147
16. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
16. Huawei P60 Pro
146
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
20. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
22. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
23. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
23. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
23. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
23. Vivo X Fold
140
27. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
27. Honor Magic Vs
139
27. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
27. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
31. Oppo Find X5
138
32. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
32. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
34. Huawei P50 Pro
135
34. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
34. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
37. Oppo Find X6
134
37. Oppo Find N2
134
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
37. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
42. Vivo X90 Pro
133
42. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
45. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
46. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
49. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
49. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
49. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
49. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
53. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
53. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
57. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
57. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
61. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
61. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
63. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
63. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
63. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
66. LG Wing
125
66. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
66. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
69. Oppo Find N
124
69. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
69. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
72. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
72. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
74. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
74. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
76. Huawei P40 Pro
120
77. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
78. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
79. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
80. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
81. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
82. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
83. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
84. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
85. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
86. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69

Pros

  • Good readability under sunlight thanks to a very high peak brightness
  • Improved management of screen reflections, thanks to advanced glass technology
  • Accurate color rendering  in most lighting environments
  • Excellent management of frame mismatches when watching all types of videos or playing video games

Cons

  • Excessively high brightness levels in video performance
  • Lack of brightness and details in indoor lighting environment
  • Poor management of involuntary touches

The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s screen performance earned the flagship device the overall top spot in our Display protocol ranking, thanks to the marked improvements in nearly all attributes, particularly over its predecessor the S23 Ultra.

In readability, the S24 Ultra was just shy of achieving the top score with its impressive performance in challenging environments. In our tests under bright sunlight, the device achieved a measured peak brightness of 2572 nits (close to the 2600 advertised), which is significantly above the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 1750 nits. Moreover, the addition of an anti-reflective glass serves to deepen contrast to make the images more vivid in challenging conditions. These combined performances mean that in direct sunlight, it’s not necessary to find a shaded area or to cover the screen with one’s hand to be able to see and read what is on the display. While performance was great outdoors, the screen’s brightness could be a little imprecise in other conditions: our testing results showed that screen brightness sometimes could be too high at night and too low in indoor environments.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s color fidelity and rendering were much better than the S23 Ultra’s, particularly outdoors where the S24 Ultra corrected the lack of color shades of its predecessor, but still came in a bit behind the top score. Also, viewing the screen at an angle would show a slight shift to pink and green.

Motion performance garnered a top score for S24 Ultra because of the excellent way it managed frame mismatches when playing videos. Additionally, the display would adapt its refresh rate to that of the video frame rate, thus avoiding judder.

The S24 Ultra should have provided a very similar video experience as its predecessor, but that was not the case. The S24 Ultra was unable to achieve the S23 Ultra’s top-scoring performance in video mainly because the screen was too bright to view the content comfortably under a low-light environment.

The device’s redesigned edged display probably contributed to improvements over the S23 Ultra in terms of touch interactions and accuracy, although there were occasions of unintentional touches when playing video games. Scrolling the web and viewing the gallery were overall smooth experiences. Touch reactivity also quickened slightly over the S23 Ultra, which was already quite good.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

161

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions


Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in an outdoor (20 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability at a 45° angle

From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

148

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux


Color rendering indoors (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering outdoors (20 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering in sunlight (>90 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
Color fidelity measurements
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.


Color shift on angle

From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)

Video

152

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)
Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max, Google Pixel 8 Pro
(Photos for illustration only)
Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

156

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

162

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch
Average Touch Response Time Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
63 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

148

Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra

163

OnePlus Open
i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
1.5 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
480 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
Aliasing (closeup)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
(Photos for illustration only)

The post Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-ultra-display-test/feed/ 0 Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra DISPLAY DISPLAY Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_readability_indoor Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_readability_shade Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_readability_sunlight Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_readability_angle_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_readability_angle_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_readability_uniformity Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_color_indoor Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_color_shade Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_color_sunlight Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_color_angle_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_color_angle_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_video_lowlight_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_video_lowlight_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_Gamut_Video_HDR10 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_Gamut_Video_SDR Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_motion_framedrops_fps_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_motion_framedrops_fps_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S24_Ultra_artifacts_aliasing_full OnePlus Open Display test https://www.dxomark.com/oneplus-open-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/oneplus-open-display-test/#respond Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:39:28 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=164233&preview=true&preview_id=164233 We put the OnePlus Open through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 7.82 inches Flexi-fluid AMOLED, (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) Dimensions: 153.4 x 73.3 [...]

The post OnePlus Open Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the OnePlus Open through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 7.82 inches Flexi-fluid AMOLED, (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 153.4 x 73.3 x 11.7 mm (6.04 x 2.89 x 0.46 inches) closed
  • Resolution: 2268 x 2440 pixels, (~426 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 1.0758:1
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

OnePlus Open OnePlus Open
147
display
Readability
160

163

Color
162

164

Video
99

162

Motion
130

159

Touch
167

170

Artifacts
163

Best

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
18th
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in Ultra-Premium Ranking
15th
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
6. Google Pixel Fold
151
6. Honor Magic V2
151
6. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
14. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
15. OnePlus Open
147
16. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
16. Huawei P60 Pro
146
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
19. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
20. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
20. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
22. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
23. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
23. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
23. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
23. Vivo X Fold
140
27. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
27. Honor Magic Vs
139
27. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
27. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
31. Oppo Find X5
138
32. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
32. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
34. Huawei P50 Pro
135
34. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
34. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
37. Oppo Find X6
134
37. Oppo Find N2
134
37. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
37. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
37. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
42. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
42. Vivo X90 Pro
133
42. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
45. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
46. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
46. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
49. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
49. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
49. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
49. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
53. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
53. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
53. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
57. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
57. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
57. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
61. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
61. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
63. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
63. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
63. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
66. LG Wing
125
66. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
66. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
69. Oppo Find N
124
69. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
69. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
72. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
72. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
74. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
74. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
76. Huawei P40 Pro
120
77. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
78. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
79. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
80. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
81. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
82. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
83. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
84. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
85. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
86. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69

Pros

  • Good color rendering when viewing photos in the gallery and web browsing
  • Good readability, which improves in outdoor conditions thanks to the anti-reflection film
  • Smooth interactions when playing video games and scrolling on the web

Cons

  • Disappointing HDR video experience under dark room due to lack of brightness and details
  • Occasionally visible frames mismatches when playing video games
    The OnePlus Open, the first foldable device from OnePlus, showed an impressive performance in our display testing, with strong results in readability, color, and artifacts.

The OnePlus Open’s readability was among the best we have seen so far, scoring near the top of the readability attribute. Color was also a high-performing attribute, coming close to a high score. Both attributes contributed to a generally pleasant experience when viewing photos or browsing the web.

Although the screen showed good brightness in indoor conditions, when it came to watching HDR videos, the screen lacked brightness and details, detracting from a pleasant experience.

One of the challenging aspects of a foldable screen for manufacturers is de-emphasizing the presence of the middle crease when the phone is unfolded. But the OnePlus Open surprised us in this respect. We evaluated the device unfolded and found the Flexi-fluid AMOLED screen’s crease to be barely visible. In addition, when sliding a finger across the display, the crease was also barely noticeable to the touch. Touch interactions on the OnePlus Open, however, were smooth when scrolling the internet or when playing video games.

The device’s handling of artifacts also earned it a top score in this attribute.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

160

OnePlus Open

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions


Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: OnePlus Open, Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, Google Pixel Fold
(Photos for illustration only)


Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: OnePlus Open, Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, Google Pixel Fold
(Photos for illustration only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

162

OnePlus Open

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux


Color rendering indoors (1000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: OnePlus Open, Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, Google Pixel Fold
(Photos for illustration only)


Color rendering in sunlight (>90 000 lux)
Clockwise from top left: OnePlus Open, Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, Google Pixel Fold
(Photos for illustration only)
Color fidelity measurements
OnePlus Open, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
OnePlus Open, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.

Video

99

OnePlus Open

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)


Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: OnePlus Open, Xiaomi Mix Fold 3, Google Pixel Fold
(Photos for illustration only)

Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

130

OnePlus Open

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

167

OnePlus Open

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch
Average Touch Response Time OnePlus Open
89 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

163

OnePlus Open

Best

i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) OnePlus Open
2.8 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency OnePlus Open
1440 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
Aliasing (closeup)
OnePlus Open
(Photos for illustration only)

OnePlus Open – Crop 1
OnePlus Open – Crop 2
OnePlus Open – Crop 3

The post OnePlus Open Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/oneplus-open-display-test/feed/ 0 OnePlus Open Best DISPLAY DISPLAY OnePlus_Open_readability_indoor OnePlus_Open_readability_sunlight OnePlus_Open_readability_uniformity OnePlus_Open_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient OnePlus_Open_color_indoor OnePlus_Open_color_sunlight OnePlus_Open_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom OnePlus_Open_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom OnePlus_Open_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom OnePlus_Open_video_lowlight_1 OnePlus_Open_Gamut_Video_HDR10 OnePlus_Open_Gamut_Video_SDR OnePlus_Open_motion_framedrops_fps_1 OnePlus_Open_motion_framedrops_fps_2 Best OnePlus_Open_artifacts_aliasing_full OnePlus_Open_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_1 OnePlus_Open_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_2 OnePlus_Open_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_3 Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Display test https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s23-fe-display-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s23-fe-display-test/#respond Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:56:44 +0000 https://www.dxomark.com/?p=163311&preview=true&preview_id=163311 We put the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases. Overview Key display specifications: 6.4 inches Dynamic AMOLED 2X (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) Dimensions: [...]

The post Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> We put the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE through our rigorous DXOMARK Display test suite to measure its performance across six criteria. In this test results, we will break down how it fared in a variety of tests and several common use cases.

Overview

Key display specifications:

  • 6.4 inches Dynamic AMOLED 2X (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio)
  • Dimensions: 158.0 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.22 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches)
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2340 pixels, (~403 ppi density)
  • Aspect ratio: 19.5:9
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz

Scoring

Sub-scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
display
Readability
117

163

Color
138

164

Video
148

162

Motion
143

159

Touch
164

170

Artifacts
90

163

DISPLAY
Position in Global Ranking
81st
1. Honor Magic6 Pro
157
2. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
155
3. Google Pixel 8 Pro
154
3. Google Pixel 8
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24+
154
3. Samsung Galaxy S24
154
7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
152
8. Google Pixel Fold
151
8. Honor Magic V2
151
8. Honor Magic5 Pro
151
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 15 Pro
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
149
11. Apple iPhone 14 Pro
149
11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5
149
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Snapdragon)
148
16. Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
148
18. OnePlus Open
147
19. Google Pixel 7 Pro
146
19. Huawei P60 Pro
146
19. Samsung Galaxy S23 Plus (Snapdragon)
146
22. Apple iPhone 15
145
22. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
145
24. Apple iPhone 15 Plus
144
24. Apple iPhone 13 Pro
144
26. Huawei Mate 50 Pro
141
27. Apple iPhone 14 Plus
140
27. Google Pixel 7a
140
27. Google Pixel 7
140
27. Honor Magic4 Ultimate
140
27. Honor 90
140
27. Oppo Find X6 Pro
140
27. Vivo X Fold
140
34. Apple iPhone 14
139
34. Asus ROG Phone 7
139
34. Honor Magic Vs
139
34. Oppo Find X5 Pro
139
34. Xiaomi Mix Fold 3
139
39. Oppo Find X5
138
40. Apple iPhone 13
136
40. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Snapdragon)
136
40. Xiaomi 13 Pro
136
43. Huawei P50 Pro
135
43. Nothing Phone (2)
135
43. Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Exynos)
135
43. Vivo X90 Pro+
135
43. Xiaomi 13
135
48. Asus Zenfone 10
134
48. Oppo Find X6
134
48. Oppo Find N2
134
48. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip4
134
48. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (Exynos)
134
48. Vivo X80 Pro (MediaTek)
134
54. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Snapdragon)
133
54. Samsung Galaxy S22 (Exynos)
133
54. Vivo X90 Pro
133
54. Vivo X80 Pro (Snapdragon)
133
54. Xiaomi 14
133
60. Vivo X70 Pro+
132
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
131
61. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
131
61. Sony Xperia 5 IV
131
61. Xiaomi 12T
131
65. Apple iPhone 13 mini
130
65. Google Pixel 6 Pro
130
65. Honor Magic4 Pro
130
65. Oppo Find N2 Flip
130
65. Realme GT 2 Pro
130
65. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Snapdragon)
130
65. Xiaomi 13 Ultra
130
72. OnePlus 11
129
72. OnePlus 10 Pro
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
129
72. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Snapdragon)
129
72. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
72. Vivo X60 Pro+
129
72. Xiaomi 13T Pro
129
72. Xiaomi 13T
129
72. Xiaomi 11T
129
81. Asus ROG Phone 6
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 5G
128
81. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
81. Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
128
81. Sony Xperia 5 V
128
86. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
127
86. OnePlus 9 Pro
127
86. OnePlus 8T
127
86. Xiaomi 12T Pro
127
90. Oppo Find X3 Pro
126
90. Sony Xperia 1 IV
126
90. Xiaomi Mix Fold 2
126
93. Google Pixel 6a
125
93. Google Pixel 6
125
93. LG Wing
125
93. OnePlus 9
125
93. OnePlus 8 Pro
125
93. Vivo X70 Pro (MediaTek)
125
93. Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
125
93. Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
125
93. Xiaomi 12S Ultra
125
93. Xiaomi 11T Pro
125
103. Honor 70
124
103. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
103. Oppo Find N
124
103. Sony Xperia 5 III
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
124
103. Xiaomi Mi 11
124
109. Apple iPhone 12 Pro
123
109. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
123
109. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G (Exynos)
123
109. Vivo X51 5G
123
109. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
114. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
114. Motorola Edge 30 Pro
122
114. Oppo Reno8 Pro 5G
122
114. Oppo Find X3 Neo
122
114. Sony Xperia 1 III
122
114. Xiaomi 12 Pro
122
120. Apple iPhone 12
120
120. Huawei P40 Pro
120
120. Nothing Phone(1)
120
120. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
124. Motorola Edge 40 Pro
118
124. Realme GT 5G
118
124. Xiaomi 12
118
127. Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
117
127. Oppo Reno5 Pro+ 5G
117
127. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
127. Xiaomi Mi 11i
117
131. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
116
131. Asus ROG Phone 5
116
133. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
134. Asus Zenfone 8
113
135. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
136. Motorola Edge 20 Pro
111
136. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
136. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
136. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
140. Fairphone 5
110
140. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
140. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
143. Lenovo Legion Y90
109
143. OnePlus Nord 2 5G
109
145. Sony Xperia 5 II
108
146. POCO F4 GT
107
146. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
148. Nubia RedMagic 6 Pro
105
149. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
149. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
149. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra
104
152. Oppo Find X2 Pro
103
153. Google Pixel 5
101
154. Google Pixel 4 XL
100
154. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
156. Microsoft Surface Duo
99
157. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
98
158. Nubia RedMagic 7 Pro
97
159. Black Shark 4S Pro
95
159. Black Shark 4 Pro
95
159. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
162. Black Shark 5 Pro
94
162. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
164. Asus ROG Phone 3
92
165. Fairphone 4
87
166. Crosscall Action-X5
77
167. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
74
168. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro
69
169. Nokia 8.3 5G
65
170. Lenovo Legion Phone 2 Pro
60
171. Samsung Galaxy A12
53
172. Realme C21
52
DISPLAY
Position in High-End Ranking
8th
1. Google Pixel 7a
140
1. Google Pixel 7
140
1. Honor 90
140
4. Nothing Phone (2)
135
5. Xiaomi 12T
131
6. TCL 20 Pro 5G
129
6. Xiaomi 11T
129
8. Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
128
9. OnePlus 8T
127
10. Google Pixel 6a
125
10. Google Pixel 6
125
12. Honor 70
124
12. Oppo Reno8 5G
124
14. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus 5G
123
15. Apple iPhone SE (2022)
122
16. Nothing Phone(1)
120
16. Samsung Galaxy A54 5G
120
18. Realme GT 5G
118
19. Vivo iQOO 7 Legend
117
20. Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
114
21. Oppo Reno6 5G
112
22. Oppo Find X3 Lite
111
22. Realme GT Neo 2 5G
111
22. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
111
25. Oppo Find X5 Lite
110
25. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
110
27. POCO F4 GT
107
27. Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
107
29. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
104
29. Sony Xperia 10 V
104
31. Sony Xperia 10 IV
100
32. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro 5G
95
33. Vivo X80 Lite 5G
94
34. Fairphone 4
87
35. Crosscall Action-X5
77

Pros

  • Accurate and smooth touch, with good reaction time in all the use cases
  • Good video performance
  • Very few frame mismatches when playing video games or watching videos

Cons

  • Degraded picture rendering under sunlight, with skin tones appearing flat amid a visibly strong yellow cast
  • When viewed at an angle, screen colors shift from pink to green
  • Low flicker frequency and aliasing

The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE’s overall display performance was average for its category, but the device stood out for its excellent touch performance, which was accurate and smooth in all tested use cases.

Users of the Galaxy S23 FE will also appreciate the device’s motion performance, whether playing games or just watching videos because frame drops were well managed.

The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE fared very well in the video-watching use case for its category. Even though its measured maximum of 1421 nits provided a good user experience in terms of web-page readability, the display’s weak spot was its image rendering under sunlight, where tones were handled in a way that resulted in an important loss of details. Finally,  color rendering was affected in every lighting condition by reflections of pink-to-green arcs on the screen.

Test summary

About DXOMARK Display tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone and other display reviews, DXOMARK engineers perform a variety of objective and perceptual tests under controlled lab and real-life conditions. Note that we evaluate display attributes using only the device’s built-in display hardware and its still image (gallery) and video apps at their default settings. (For in-depth information about how we evaluate smartphone and other displays, check out our articles, “How DXOMARK tests display quality” and “A closer look at DXOMARK Display testing.”

The following section gathers key elements of our exhaustive tests and analyses performed in DXOMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations under the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.

Readability

117

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

163

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Readability score is composed

Readability evaluates how easily and comfortably users can read still content (photos & web) on the display under different real-life conditions. DXOMARK uses its Display Bench to recreate ambient light conditions ranging from total darkness to bright sunlight. In addition to laboratory tests, perceptual analysis is also made in real-life environments.

Learn more about how we test display readability
Luminance under various lighting conditions
Contrast under various lighting conditions


Readability in an indoor (1000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Xiaomi 13T, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustrations only)


Readability in a sunlight (>90 000 lux) environment
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Xiaomi 13T, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustrations only)

Luminance uniformity measurement
This graph shows the uniformity of the display with a 20% gray pattern. The more visible the green color, the more uniform the display.

Color

138

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

164

Google Pixel 8 Pro
i
How Display Color score is composed

The color attribute evaluates the capacity of the device to accurately reproduce colors. The measurements taken are for fidelity, white point color, and gamut coverage. We perform color evaluations for different lighting conditions to see how well the device can manage color in the surrounding environment. Colors are measured using a spectrophotometer in a controlled lighting environment. Perceptual analysis of color rendering is against the reference pattern displayed on a calibrated professional monitor.

Learn more about how we test display color
White point under D65 illuminant at 1000 lux

Color fidelity measurements
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the sRGB color space
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, color fidelity at 1000 lux in the Display-P3 color space
Each arrow represents the color difference between a target color pattern (base of the arrow) and its actual measurement (tip of the arrow). The longer the arrow, the more visible the color difference is. If the arrow stays within the circle, the color difference will be visible only to trained eyes.
Color behavior on angle
This graph shows the color shift when the screen is at an angle. Each dot represents a measurement at a particular angle. Dots inside the inner circle exhibit no color shift in angle; those between the inner and outer circle have shifts that only trained experts will see; but those falling outside the outer circle are noticeable.

Video

148

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

162

Samsung Galaxy S23 (Snapdragon)
i
How Display Video score is composed

Our video attribute evaluates the Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR10) video handling of each device in indoor and low-light conditions. We measure tone mapping, color gamut, brightness and contrast of the display. We perform perceptual analysis against our professional reference monitor (Sony BVM-HX310) to ensure that the rendering respects the artistic intent.

Learn more about how we test display video
Video brightness at 10% APL in the dark ( < 5 lux)


Video rendering in a low-light (0 lux) environment
Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Xiaomi 13T, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustrations only)

Clockwise from top left: Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, Samsung Galaxy A54 5G, Xiaomi 13T, Google Pixel 8
(Photos for illustrations only)
Gamut coverage for video content
HDR10 Gamut coverage
SDR Gamut coverage
The primary colors are measured both in HDR10 and SDR. The extracted color gamut shows the extent of the color area that the device can render. To respect the artistic intent, the measured gamut should match the master color space of each video.

Motion

143

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

159

Honor Magic6 Pro
i
How Display Motion score is composed

The motion attribute evaluates the handling of dynamic contents. Frame drops, motion blur, and playback artifacts are scrutinized using games and videos.

Learn more about how we test display motion


Video frame drops
30 fps content
60 fps content
These long exposure photos present the number of frame irregularities in a 30-second video. A good performance shows a regular pattern (either a flat gray image or a pull-down pattern).

Touch

164

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

170

Samsung Galaxy S24+
i
How Display Touch score is composed

To evaluate touch, DXOMARK uses a touch robot and a high-speed camera to play and record a set of scenarios for smoothness, accuracy and response-time evaluation.

Learn more about how we test display touch
Average Touch Response Time Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
47 ms
Fast
Good
Bad
Slow
This response time test evaluates precisely the time elapsed between a single touch of the robot on the screen and the displayed action. This test is applied to activities that require a high reactivity, such as gaming.

Artifacts

90

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

163

OnePlus Open
i
How Display Artifacts score is composed

Evaluating artifacts means checking for the performance, image rendering and motion flaws that can affect the end-user experience. DXOMARK measures precisely the device’s reflectance and the presence of flicker, and assesses the impact of residual aliasing when playing video games, among other characteristics.

Learn more about how we test display motion
Average Reflectance (SCI) Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
5.2 %
Low
Good
Bad
High
Reflectance (SCI)
Measurements above show the reflection of the device within the visible spectrum range (400 nm to 700 nm). It includes both diffuse and specular reflection.
Flicker Frequency Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
240 Hz
Bad
Good
Bad
Great
Temporal Light Modulation
This graph represents the frequencies of lighting variation; the highest peak gives the main flicker frequency.
Aliasing (closeup)
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE – Crop1
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE – Crop 2
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE – Crop3

The post Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Display test appeared first on DXOMARK.

]]> https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s23-fe-display-test/feed/ 0 Samsung Galaxy S23 FE DISPLAY DISPLAY Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_readability_indoor Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_readability_sunlight Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_readability_uniformity Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_White_Point_CCT_vs_Ambient Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_Color_Fidelity_Still_sRGB_1000lux_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_Color_Fidelity_Still_P3_1000lux_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_Scatter_Cono_White_P3_Zoom Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_video_lowlight_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_video_lowlight_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_Gamut_Video_HDR10 Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_Gamut_Video_SDR Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_motion_framedrops_fps_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_motion_framedrops_fps_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_artifacts_aliasing_full Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_1 Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_2 Samsung_Galaxy_S23_FE_artifacts_aliasing_crops_dut_3